Which item is NOT a required element of IRB/IEC confirmation of review?

Prepare for the ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Exam for Certified Clinical Research Coordinator with engaging multiple-choice questions and detailed explanations. Elevate your understanding and expertise to excel in your certification exam!

Multiple Choice

Which item is NOT a required element of IRB/IEC confirmation of review?

Explanation:
The main idea here is what the ethics review confirmation must show to prove that proper IRB/IEC review occurred and was compliant with GCP and laws. A valid confirmation should identify the reviewing body (name and address), include a statement that the IRB/IEC operates in accordance with GCP and applicable laws, and provide evidence of the actual review outcome—typically the approved or favorable opinion with the date and any conditions—along with copies of the protocol and consent documents that were reviewed. The sponsor’s financial statement isn’t connected to the ethical review, rights protection, or regulatory compliance aspects of the study, so it isn’t a required element in the confirmation of review.

The main idea here is what the ethics review confirmation must show to prove that proper IRB/IEC review occurred and was compliant with GCP and laws. A valid confirmation should identify the reviewing body (name and address), include a statement that the IRB/IEC operates in accordance with GCP and applicable laws, and provide evidence of the actual review outcome—typically the approved or favorable opinion with the date and any conditions—along with copies of the protocol and consent documents that were reviewed. The sponsor’s financial statement isn’t connected to the ethical review, rights protection, or regulatory compliance aspects of the study, so it isn’t a required element in the confirmation of review.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy