Why might significance levels be adjusted when multiple analyses are performed?

Prepare for the ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Exam for Certified Clinical Research Coordinator with engaging multiple-choice questions and detailed explanations. Elevate your understanding and expertise to excel in your certification exam!

Multiple Choice

Why might significance levels be adjusted when multiple analyses are performed?

Explanation:
When you run multiple analyses, the chance of finding at least one false positive increases. This phenomenon is multiplicity. To prevent the overall probability of a type I error from rising above the pre-specified level (often 0.05) across all tests, the significance level used for each individual test is adjusted downward. This keeps the family-wise error rate under control, preserving the integrity of the conclusions. In practice, you might see methods like Bonferroni corrections or alpha-spending approaches used, especially with interim looks or multiple endpoints. The goal is to maintain a reliable overall error rate, not to inflate p-values, shorten the trial, or ignore multiplicity.

When you run multiple analyses, the chance of finding at least one false positive increases. This phenomenon is multiplicity. To prevent the overall probability of a type I error from rising above the pre-specified level (often 0.05) across all tests, the significance level used for each individual test is adjusted downward. This keeps the family-wise error rate under control, preserving the integrity of the conclusions. In practice, you might see methods like Bonferroni corrections or alpha-spending approaches used, especially with interim looks or multiple endpoints. The goal is to maintain a reliable overall error rate, not to inflate p-values, shorten the trial, or ignore multiplicity.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy